Why does IVDW = 11 cause bad elastic constants in a particular mineral?

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Message
Author
manuel_engel1
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon May 08, 2023 4:08 pm

Re: Why does IVDW = 11 cause bad elastic constants in a particular mineral?

#16 Post by manuel_engel1 » Wed Aug 14, 2024 11:40 am

I have a few final suggestions. You can try the following:
  • Use PBEsol (GGA=PS)
  • Run with ALGO=All, which usually improves convergence for magnetic systems
  • Vary POTIM and check if the results are stable
  • Make sure that you have a sensible MAGMOM. There is a change you don't reach the correct magnetic groundstate and are stuck in a local minimum. Changing MAGMOM or preconverging the calculation with a nonmagnetic calculation can help with convergence.
I'm afraid this is all the advice we can give. Make sure that you systematically double-check all your convergence criteria (KPOINTS, ENCUT, EDIFF, POTIM). This might still be due to an underconverged calculation, though I doubt that it's related to ENCUT.
Manuel
VASP developer

Post Reply