problems about optimization of ENCUT ......

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Locked
Message
Author
xinhuanwen

problems about optimization of ENCUT ......

#1 Post by xinhuanwen » Thu May 06, 2010 2:37 pm

hello everyone

please help me

I am calculating a superlattice system consist of graphene nanoribbons.now I want to know its properties of the ground state,especially its magnetism:pm afm or fm.so for each condition,i will calculate the total energy respectively ,the lowest is the ground state .

First of all . i think i must optimize the ENCUT for each condition .but i only optimize the pm . for my system ENMAX=400ev. during the optimization,the total energy doesn't converge,the difference with different energy cutoffs are about 5or6 mev not 1mev.
kpoints(11 5 1)
360 -41.234745
400 -41.205839
440 -41.186058
480 -41.180300
520 -41.178179
560 -41.180316
600 -41.186082
630 -41.191180
660 -41.196265
690 -41.200828
720 -41.204283
kpoints(11 11 1)
360 -41.234788
400 -41.205852
440 -41.186038
480 -41.180291
520 -41.178186
560 -41.180322
600 -41.186084
630 -41.191185
660 -41.196266
kpoints(13 13 1)
360 -41.276285
400 -41.246915
440 -41.227022
480 -41.221409
520 -41.219294
560 -41.221406
600 -41.227183
630 -41.232272
660 -41.237363
690 -41.241937
720 -41.245368


I didn't obtain the proper ENCUT value.

My questions are:1 is it OK if i only optimize the pm ,not the fm and afm?

2 how can i get the proper ENCUT value ,namely the difference with different energy cutoffs keep around 1mev ?

3 Is the difference with different total energy (eg. the total energy of the PM and the FM for the same superlattice ) absolute? for another superlattice ,i must use the same encut value ?because i want to compare the differences of the different supperlattice (eg. i have two superlatteces A and B. for A:E1=difference with fm and afm of A superlattice ; for B: E2=difference with fm and afm of B superlattice; i want to compare E1 and E2 ) .for A and B superlattice , the k-mesh must be identical?
..............................................................................................................................................................................
optencu.sh
..........................
rm WAVECAR
mpd&
for i in 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 630 660 690 720
do
cat>INCAR<<!
ENCUT=$i
ISTART=0
ICHARG=2
ISMEAR=-5
SIGMA=0.2
NELM=100
!
echo "ENCUT=$i ev"
mpiexec -n 8 vasp
E=$(grep "TOTEN" OUTCAR|tail -1|awk '{printf "%12.6f \n",$5}')
echo $i $E >>comment
done
t.sh
.......................................................................................
POSCAR
..............
8(the width between the nanoribbion) 2(the width of the nanoribbion in the superlattice )
2.465
1 0 0
0 6.928 0
0 0 8
4 2
cart
0 0.577 0
0.5 0.866 0
0.5 1.443 0
0 1.732 0
0 0 0
0 2.308 0
.......................................................................................
Last edited by xinhuanwen on Thu May 06, 2010 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

support_vasp
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 1817
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am

Re: problems about optimization of ENCUT ......

#2 Post by support_vasp » Wed Sep 11, 2024 2:17 pm

Hi,

We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.

Best wishes,

VASP


Locked