My Community

Dear admin,

According to literature, Pt is a strong paramagnet close to the Stoner transition to ferromagnetism, and it is nonmagnetic in bulk.
See PHYSICAL REVIEW B 94, 144431 (2016)

I tried a few static calculations of fcc bulk Pd and found that the magnetization results depend on k-mesh.
For a 12*12*12, both Gamma-centered and Monkhorst-Pack mesh give the same result ~0.24 mu_B.
However, for 6*6*6, Gamma-centered mesh gives ~0.38 mu_B but Monkhorst-Pack mesh gives a non-magnetic result.

In summary, the magnetic moments are
6*6*6 12*12*12
0.377 0.249 Gamma-centered
0.000 0.237 Monkhorst-Pack

This is consistent with the result shown in Materials Project:
https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-2/

Their calculation of Pd turns out to be non-magnetic, where they do use 6*6*6 Monkhorst-Pack mesh.
I repeated their calculation but change 6*6*6 Monkhorst-Pack mesh to Gamma-centered mesh. And I got the magnetization ~0.3 mu_B.



Furthermore, when I added GGA=PS in the INCAR to perform the PBEsol calculation, I got different results.

6*6*6 12*12*12
0.325 0.000 Gamma-centered
0.000 0.000 Monkhorst-Pack



How to understand this strange behavior?

Best,
Binglun Yin

Hi,

We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.

Best wishes,

VASP